A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away. -- Barry Goldwater
Navigate

Blog Home

NTU Home Page

Blog FAQs

About "Government Bytes!"

Support NTU

 
Subscribe
Sign up with NTU's Taxpayer Action Center





 
Blog Contributors
Aleksander Danilov
Guest Blogger

Andrew Moylan
Director of Government Affairs

Dan Barrett
Policy Analyst

David Keating
Senior Counselor

Demian Brady
Senior Policy Analyst

Elizabeth Terrell
Guest Blogger

Jeff Dircksen
Director of Congressional Analysis

Jordan Forbes
Federal Government Affairs Manager

Joshua Culling
State Government Affairs Manager

Kristina Rasmussen
Guest Blogger

Kristine Tuinstra
State Policy Analyst

NTU Gov
Government Affairs & Communications Associate

Paul Gessing
Guest Blogger

Pete Sepp
Vice President for Communications

Rachael Slobodien
Communications Manager

Ross Kaminsky
Blogger

Sam Batkins
Guest Blogger

Tom Horne
Policy Associate

Send to a Friend
Email:
Send to Friend
The Official Blog of National Taxpayers Union

Earmark "Chaka"

Posted by Dominic Rupprecht - June 27, 2007

Last week, a commenter on my post about sewer projects in the House Interior Appropriations Bill defended an earmark for a “Northeastern Illinois Sewer Improvement Consortium for Sewer Improvement” by claiming it was a worthwhile project. I won’t get into the merits of the Sewer Consortium, but it’s the kind of argument that you often hear from defenders of earmarks. Indeed, most earmarks aren’t Indoor Rainforests (although some are) and sound like perfectly reasonable spending projects.

“Sound like” is the key phrase there. On top of a number of problems with earmarks on a philosophical and constitutional level (which I outlined in my response to the commenter), earmarks also leave the system open to corruption and Congressmen bribing us with our own money.

Well, now it looks like Representative Chaka Fattah (D-PA) might have just proved my point. According to Americans for Prosperity, the Congressman is married to a trustee of the Philadelphia Art Museum, which is slated to receive a $100,000 earmark from Fattah in the aforementioned Interior Bill. In addition to his wife’s position as a trustee of the museum, members of the museum board have donated thousands of dollars to Fattah’s reelection campaigns.

Representative Jeff Flake offered an amendment to kill the earmark this morning (along with four other projects). Unsurprisingly, each amendment failed on a voice vote.

UPDATE: Republicans get in on the fun as Jerry Lewis (R-CA) secures a $500,000 earmark to "beautify" a metro stop a few blocks from his million-dollar home according to Americans for Prosperity.


Thoughts?   Add Comment -


said on Jun 27 2007 at 2:45pm
This is a Chaking development!