A bureaucrat differs from a nonbureaucrat precisely because he is working in a field in which it is impossible to appraise the result of a mans effort in terms of money. -- Ludwig von Mises
Navigate

Blog Home

NTU Home Page

Blog FAQs

About "Government Bytes!"

Support NTU

 
Subscribe
Sign up with NTU's Taxpayer Action Center





 
Blog Contributors
Aleksander Danilov
Guest Blogger

Andrew Moylan
Director of Government Affairs

Dan Barrett
Policy Analyst

David Keating
Senior Counselor

Demian Brady
Senior Policy Analyst

Elizabeth Terrell
Guest Blogger

Jeff Dircksen
Director of Congressional Analysis

Jordan Forbes
Federal Government Affairs Manager

Joshua Culling
State Government Affairs Manager

Kristina Rasmussen
Guest Blogger

Kristine Tuinstra
State Policy Analyst

NTU Gov
Government Affairs & Communications Associate

Paul Gessing
Guest Blogger

Pete Sepp
Vice President for Communications

Rachael Slobodien
Communications Manager

Ross Kaminsky
Blogger

Sam Batkins
Guest Blogger

Tom Horne
Policy Associate

Send to a Friend
Email:
Send to Friend
The Official Blog of National Taxpayers Union

If Terrorists are Afraid of Pork, We're in Good Shape

Posted by Dominic Rupprecht - August 06, 2007

Before skipping town on Saturday for their August recess, the House of Representatives passed the Defense Appropriations Bill and the $3 billion worth of earmarks that came with it.

Once again members of the Appropriations Committee – and especially the Defense Subcommittee – were raking in bacon hand over fist. According to data compiled by Taxpayers for Common Sense* (who deserve tons of credit for digging up the cost of these earmarks as the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee didn’t disclose the cost in its earmark report):

You can see what this breakdown looks like by clicking on the image below:




To see the breakdown of Defense earmarks by state* click on the image below, and to see the breakdown per member*, click on the image below that.








*This data doesn’t match up with the summary data provided by TCS. That’s because I’ve included all earmark requests made by those members, while TCS appears to have only included earmarks on which those members were the sole sponsor. As such, some earmarks are counted more than once.


Thoughts?   Add Comment -


There are no comments for this entry yet.