I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. -- Barry Goldwater
Navigate

Blog Home

NTU Home Page

Blog FAQs

About "Government Bytes!"

Support NTU

 
Subscribe
Sign up with NTU's Taxpayer Action Center





 
Blog Contributors
Andrew Moylan
Director of Government Affairs

Dan Barrett
Policy Analyst

David Keating
Senior Counselor

Demian Brady
Senior Policy Analyst

Elizabeth Terrell
Guest Blogger

Jeff Dircksen
Director of Congressional Analysis

Jordan Forbes
Federal Government Affairs Manager

Joshua Culling
State Government Affairs Manager

Kristina Rasmussen
Guest Blogger

Kristine Tuinstra
State Policy Analyst

NTU Gov
Government Affairs & Communications Associate

Paul Gessing
Guest Blogger

Pete Sepp
Vice President for Communications

Rachael Slobodien
Communications Manager

Ross Kaminsky
Blogger

Sam Batkins
Guest Blogger

Tom Horne
Policy Associate

Send to a Friend
Email:
Send to Friend
The Official Blog of National Taxpayers Union

A Choice for Taxpayers

Posted by Dominic Rupprecht - October 11, 2007

Paul Ryan, one of the taxpayer's best friends in Washington, has introduced a fabulous new tax package: The Taxpayer Choice Act.

The Taxpayer Choice Act would repeal of the AMT, saving the taxpayers $840 billion. On top of this vital reform, Ryan's bill creates a simplified optional tax structure: 10 percent on joint earnings up to $100,000 (or $50,000 for single filers) and 25 percent rate on everything above that. It would also make permanent President Bush's capital gains and dividends tax cuts.

Taxpayers who prefer to spend countless hours filling out the mounds of paperwork can still choose to do so (of course, those taxpayers have probably all been institutionalized already).

Sadly, not everyone is on board with Ryan's bill (cosponsored by Reps Hensarling and Campbell). According to Robert Novak:
Nevertheless, Paulson and the Treasury cannot live with it because they are unwilling to give up that $840 billion in extra revenue. Neither can Rep. Jim McCrery, ranking Republican on Ways and Means.

Ryan, Hensarling and Campbell pose a gut check for the Republican Party. Is it willing to part with a rapacious tax without replacing the revenue and offer taxpayers a bold choice? In 1978, the Republican National Committee under Chairman Bill Brock endorsed Kemp-Roth. To take a similar daring step today, the party would have to divorce itself from the Bush administration's tutelage and embark on a course of tax simplification and spending discipline.

Someone should probably tell President Bush that if the Republicans don't start taking "daring steps" they're going to end up taking an embarrassing fall.



Thoughts?   Add Comment -


There are no comments for this entry yet.