The metamorphosis of taxes into weapons of destruction is the mark of present-day public finance. -- Ludwig von Mises
Navigate

Blog Home

NTU Home Page

Blog FAQs

About "Government Bytes!"

Support NTU

 
Subscribe
Sign up with NTU's Taxpayer Action Center





 
Blog Contributors
Aleksander Danilov
Guest Blogger

Andrew Moylan
Director of Government Affairs

Dan Barrett
Policy Analyst

David Keating
Senior Counselor

Demian Brady
Senior Policy Analyst

Elizabeth Terrell
Guest Blogger

Jeff Dircksen
Director of Congressional Analysis

Jordan Forbes
Federal Government Affairs Manager

Joshua Culling
State Government Affairs Manager

Kristina Rasmussen
Guest Blogger

Kristine Tuinstra
State Policy Analyst

NTU Gov
Government Affairs & Communications Associate

Paul Gessing
Guest Blogger

Pete Sepp
Vice President for Communications

Rachael Slobodien
Communications Manager

Ross Kaminsky
Blogger

Sam Batkins
Guest Blogger

Tom Horne
Policy Associate

Send to a Friend
Email:
Send to Friend
The Official Blog of National Taxpayers Union

Pell Grants for Kids in the State of the Union Speech

Posted by Demian Brady - January 31, 2008

Among the new spending in President Bush's final State of the Union Address was a proposal to create a Pell Grants for Kids program:
"I ask you to support a new $300 million program called Pell Grants for Kids. We have seen how Pell Grants help low-income college students realize their full potential. Together, we have expanded the size and reach of these grants. Now let's apply that same spirit to help liberate poor children trapped in failing public schools."
Interestingly, this is an old idea that has been revived, and significantly scaled back. In 2004, Senator Lamar Alexander supported and earlier form of Pell Grants for Kids, funded at $15 billion a year.

I was wondering whether Bush's proposal would be offset by reductions in No Child Left Behind funding. Given the history of this proposal, that seems unlikely. Senator Alexander emphasized that this new program would be in addition to regular federal support for education.

If public schools will have fewer students because taxpayers are subsidizing their enrollment in private schools, shouldn't the public schools receive less federal funding? If the schools are failing should we keep pumping money into them, or perhaps open them to competition?

I look forward to more information in the FY 2009 Budget that will be released next Tuesday.

Thoughts?   Add Comment -


Elizabeth Terrell said on Jan 31 2008 at 11:35am
Actually, the concept of "Pell Grants for Kids" goes back to 1979 when it was originally introduced as S. 1101.

From the prepared statement of Senator Alexander in 2004:

"This idea has a long bipartisan history. I have mentioned Senator Pell’s work in what we now call in higher education the Pell Grant. That may or may not be what it should be called in K through 12, but it has been there in higher education for some time. In 1979, Democratic Senators Pat Moynihan and Abe Ribicoff introduced legislation that would have made elementary and secondary students eligible for Pell Grants. In 1992, when I was the U.S. Education Secretary, President George H.W. Bush proposed a so-called GI Bill for Kids which would have provided $1,000 scholarships in a pilot program under similar guidelines."

Senate Hearing 108-815, July 15, 2004
http://tinyurl.com/283cxz
[PDF]

This concept was originally introduced as S. 1101 in 1979 (See Page 18 of S. Hrg. 108-815 linked above for an introduction transcript from 1979). Imagine, if they'd adopted this legislation in 1979, we might not have even had to deal with NCLB.