Taxes are commonly a calamity for the people and a nightmare for the government. For the former they are always excessive; for the latter they are never enough, never too much.--Juan de Mariana
Navigate

Blog Home

NTU Home Page

Blog FAQs

About "Government Bytes!"

Support NTU

 
Subscribe
Sign up with NTU's Taxpayer Action Center





 
Blog Contributors
Aleksander Danilov
Guest Blogger

Andrew Moylan
Director of Government Affairs

Dan Barrett
Policy Analyst

David Keating
Senior Counselor

Demian Brady
Senior Policy Analyst

Elizabeth Terrell
Guest Blogger

Jeff Dircksen
Director of Congressional Analysis

Jordan Forbes
Federal Government Affairs Manager

Joshua Culling
State Government Affairs Manager

Kristina Rasmussen
Guest Blogger

Kristine Tuinstra
State Policy Analyst

NTU Gov
Government Affairs & Communications Associate

Paul Gessing
Guest Blogger

Pete Sepp
Vice President for Communications

Rachael Slobodien
Communications Manager

Ross Kaminsky
Blogger

Sam Batkins
Guest Blogger

Tom Horne
Policy Associate

Send to a Friend
Email:
Send to Friend
The Official Blog of National Taxpayers Union

Rep. Grayson and his idea of "performance based" salaries

Posted by Keith Capp - March 31, 2009

Recently, the Washington Examiner interviewed Rep. Alan Grayson (FL-8) about his bill, the Pay for Performance Act of 2009, which would regulate the pay of anyone who works at a company that received an investment from the Federal government under the stimulus or TARP legislation. During the interview Grayson said,
This bill will show which Republicans are so much on the take from the financial services industry that they're willing to actually bless compensation that has no bearing on performance and is excessive and unreasonable.
What I find ironic is that many government salaries aren’t based on performance and are excessive and unreasonable! Maybe we could start with the performance of many members of Congress. Luckily for Mr. Grayson, he automatically receives a pay raise that isn’t based on his performance or for showing up to work. He gets it automatically for being elected to his position. (Ordinary American’s certainly don’t get automatic raises.) Maybe Congressional salaries and pensions could be a place he could start his vendetta to assure that compensation is based on performance.

Just in case Mr. Grayson was curious, the Gallop’s public approval rating for Congress is 39%. Obviously the public approves of Congress’ performance. Too bad we don’t get to vote on their salaries.

Click here to read the Washington Examiner’s article.

Click here to view Gallop’s poll.

Thoughts?   Add Comment -


gburg61 said on Apr 02 2009 at 5:55am
keep it up keith...all of washington is the problem and mainly democrats... why single out a republican?? on an average they are far better than the socialist(ooops I mean democratic )party