Washington is the only place where sound travels faster than light.--C.V.R. Thompson
Navigate

Blog Home

NTU Home Page

Blog FAQs

About "Government Bytes!"

Support NTU

 
Subscribe
Sign up with NTU's Taxpayer Action Center





 
Blog Contributors
Aleksander Danilov
Guest Blogger

Andrew Moylan
Director of Government Affairs

Dan Barrett
Policy Analyst

David Keating
Senior Counselor

Demian Brady
Senior Policy Analyst

Elizabeth Terrell
Guest Blogger

Jeff Dircksen
Director of Congressional Analysis

Jordan Forbes
Federal Government Affairs Manager

Joshua Culling
State Government Affairs Manager

Kristina Rasmussen
Guest Blogger

Kristine Tuinstra
State Policy Analyst

NTU Gov
Government Affairs & Communications Associate

Paul Gessing
Guest Blogger

Pete Sepp
Vice President for Communications

Rachael Slobodien
Communications Manager

Ross Kaminsky
Blogger

Sam Batkins
Guest Blogger

Tom Horne
Policy Associate

Send to a Friend
Email:
Send to Friend
The Official Blog of National Taxpayers Union

Health Care Reform: Rhetoric vs. Reality, Visualized

Posted by Andrew Moylan - July 30, 2009


Rhetoric vs. Reality

Thoughts?   Add Comment -


said on Aug 06 2009 at 4:42pm
aRE WE STILL LIVING IN aMERICA?


Vi Schick said on Aug 06 2009 at 11:02pm
Remember Robert Preston in the Music Man? Well, he sold a dream, and he was convincible--but when he was about to be run out of town, he convinced the parents that the kids had musical talent and they were all so proud. Just as the voters got sucked into Obama's dream. The only thing the apprentice president had was a dream and he convinced the majority of the voters and now they are stuck with him. It's time for America to wake up. His dream has now become a nightmare.


ACW said on Aug 07 2009 at 5:09pm
There are plenty of good reasons for being against this healthcare reform bill, but please, let's not pick on word statistics. I am certain that these statistics are entirely typical of United States law language. Laws, after all, exist to tell people what to do.

This particular argument would only be valid if it could be shown that other laws (say, the USA PATRIOT act) were substantially different in their tone. And I'm willing to bet they're not.

Surely there is plenty of substance to attack in this bill without resorting to silly word-counting games.