We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. -- Winston Churchill
Navigate

Blog Home

NTU Home Page

Blog FAQs

About "Government Bytes!"

Support NTU

 
Subscribe
Sign up with NTU's Taxpayer Action Center





 
Blog Contributors
Aleksander Danilov
Guest Blogger

Andrew Moylan
Director of Government Affairs

Dan Barrett
Policy Analyst

David Keating
Senior Counselor

Demian Brady
Senior Policy Analyst

Elizabeth Terrell
Guest Blogger

Jeff Dircksen
Director of Congressional Analysis

Jordan Forbes
Federal Government Affairs Manager

Joshua Culling
State Government Affairs Manager

Kristina Rasmussen
Guest Blogger

Kristine Tuinstra
State Policy Analyst

NTU Gov
Government Affairs & Communications Associate

Paul Gessing
Guest Blogger

Pete Sepp
Vice President for Communications

Rachael Slobodien
Communications Manager

Ross Kaminsky
Blogger

Sam Batkins
Guest Blogger

Tom Horne
Policy Associate

Send to a Friend
Email:
Send to Friend
The Official Blog of National Taxpayers Union

Coburn's Victory

Posted by Sam Batkins - September 22, 2005

Taxpayers scored a victory last night when the Senate agreed to Senator Tom Coburn’s amendment to provide needed transparency in the budget process.

“The Coburn amendment requires that any limitation, directive, or earmarking be included in the bill’s conference report. Previous Senate procedures allowed the Senate to automatically approve earmarks or special projects included in the House version of an appropriations bill. Consequently, many earmarks that became law did not even come up for a vote in the Senate. This process was used to essentially hide millions of dollars of pork spending from public view.”

The Senate agreed to the amendment by a vote of 55-39. In case you were wondering, these are the 39 Senators who do not think it is a good idea:

Allard (R-CO), Baucus (D-MT), Bennett (R-UT), Bond (R-MO), Bunning (R-KY), Byrd (D-WV), Carper (D-DE), Chambliss (R-GA), Cochran (R-MS), Coleman (R-MN), Conrad (D-ND), DeWine (R-OH), Dole (R-NC), Dorgan (D-ND), Durbin (D-IL), Frist (R-TN), Grassley (R-IA), Gregg (R-NH), Hagel (R-NE), Harkin (D-IA), Hatch (R-UT), Hutchison (R-TX), Jeffords (I-VT), Johnson (D-SD), Kennedy (D-MA), Lautenberg (D-NJ), Leahy (D-VT), Lincoln (D-AR), Lott (R-MS), Murray (D-WA), Pryor (D-AR), Reed (D-RI), Reid (D-NV), Sarbanes (D-MD), Shelby (R-AL), Smith (R-OR), Stevens (R-AK), Thune (R-SD), Vitter (R-LA).

Thoughts?   Add Comment -


Homer said on Sep 22 2005 at 11:06am
39 Senators who apparently think Washington needs more business-as-usual.


Misterpolitics said on Sep 22 2005 at 11:58am
I'm surprised and disappointed. There are a lot of "conservative" Republicans on that list.

I noticed DeMint isn't on that list, suprise, surprise.


Brad said on Sep 22 2005 at 1:50pm
Why am I not surprised Byrd, Thune, and Stevens were on that list?


Ihatepork said on Sep 22 2005 at 3:54pm
Allard? Vitter?

Some surprises here.

I don't understand why anyone would vote against this amendment.


Dahla Bille said on Sep 23 2005 at 7:22am
Obscurity provides a cover for Senators looking to slip in something for the home state, which is potentially more valuable for a member who likes to talk about cutting big government but still wants to bring home the bacon.


said on Sep 26 2005 at 9:15am
It's about time! I can't believe Kay Baily Hutchinson was on there. I'm going to write my senator and ask her why.