Three groups spend other people's money: children, thieves, politicians. All three need supervision. -- Dick Armey

Blog Home

NTU Home Page

Blog FAQs

About "Government Bytes!"

Support NTU

Sign up with NTU's Taxpayer Action Center

Blog Contributors
Andrew Moylan
Director of Government Affairs

Dan Barrett
Policy Analyst

David Keating
Senior Counselor

Demian Brady
Senior Policy Analyst

Elizabeth Terrell
Guest Blogger

Jeff Dircksen
Director of Congressional Analysis

Jordan Forbes
Federal Government Affairs Manager

Joshua Culling
State Government Affairs Manager

Kristina Rasmussen
Guest Blogger

Kristine Tuinstra
State Policy Analyst

Government Affairs & Communications Associate

Paul Gessing
Guest Blogger

Pete Sepp
Vice President for Communications

Rachael Slobodien
Communications Manager

Ross Kaminsky

Sam Batkins
Guest Blogger

Tom Horne
Policy Associate

Send to a Friend
Send to Friend
The Official Blog of National Taxpayers Union

Protecting Mr. Kennedy's Neighborhood

Posted by Boddington - December 08, 2005

Rep. Mark Kennedy (R-MN) did finally vote for the Deficit Reduction Act (H.R. 4241), but his vote certainly did not come cheap. Before agreeing to support the legislation, Kennedy forced House Leaders to pull drilling in ANWR, weaken the food stamp reforms, and promise an extension of the MILC program (payments to milk producers) and further increases to the LIHEAP (low-income energy assistance) program in conference. After agreeing to all that, Acting Majority Leader Roy Blunt still had to literally accompany him to the vote to make sure he showed up. Such is the state of the House Republican Conference.

Well, Mr. Kennedy (who is running for the Senate) has a new item on his list of spending priorities. He now wants to pump $400 million over ten years into the current Federal Duck Stamps Program because it is not buying up enough wetlands for preservation. In a letter to his colleagues, he writes:

Our country is facing a growing wetlands crisis. More than 50 percent of our nation’s wetlands have already been lost, and some states have lost as much as 90 percent of their wetlands critical for waterfowl and wildlife habitat.

The best way we can help address this situation is to invest more into our Duck Stamp program. The Federal Duck Stamp program is the most successful conservation program in the country. Over the years, Federal Duck Stamps helped purchase or lease over 5.2 million acres of wetlands and waterfowl habitat in the U.S. In addition, for every dollar spent on Federal Duck Stamps, ninety-eight cents go directly to purchase and protect vital wetlands and wildlife habitat in the National Wildlife Refuge System.

The Federal Duck Stamp program is largely paid for by sportsmen and women. However, because the number of hunters in the U.S. has remained relatively static while the price of land is on the rise, we are no longer able to purchase the necessary lands to preserve the habitat needed for wildlife production. This is a situation that we cannot afford if we want future generations to continue to enjoy the great outdoors.

To address this problem, we have introduced H.R. 4315, the Kennedy-Thompson Emergency Wetlands Loan Act of 2005. This bill would increase resources for wetlands preservation by reauthorizing the Wetlands Loan Act at $400 million over the next 10 years.

To match the challenge of habitat preservation, the bill includes an incremental increase of the price of the duck stamp that is explicitly tied to the repayment of the loan without disrupting the current dollars in the duck stamp program. With these provisions, H.R. 4315 provides a fiscally responsible approach and recreates the kind of public-private partnership that has been the hallmark of successful wildlife conservation programs for decades.

Mr. Kennedy wants to increase spending now to buy up wetlands (“as an advance”) and pay for it later with an incremental increase in duck stamps that may or may not be bought, especially since they will now cost more. In theory, the new stamp revenues will then be “credited” to the loan. Talk about a fake offset. For the record, this is a perfect example of why conservatives ought to be extremely suspicious of these special stamp tax programs at their inception. Eventually, the “need” for the spending outpaces the zeal of the stamp purchasers, causing a “shortfall” with a ready-made constituency for additional federal spending. Also, according to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, since 1934, duck stamps have generated $670 million and purchased 5.2 million acres of wetlands. Kennedy wants to spend an additional $400 million in just ten years! Exactly how many additional acres of wetlands does the federal government need to purchase? And with 653 million acres already (28% of the country), doesn’t the federal government own enough land? Enough is enough.

Thoughts?   Add Comment -

Mookie said on Dec 08 2005 at 2:23pm

Judging by his support for milk subsidies and federal wetland protection, one has to assume that Mr. Kennedy thinks the cows and ducks in his home state of Minnesota will carry him to victory for the Senate seat. Maybe Mr. Kennedy should be paying a little less attention to the wildlife in his state, and start paying more attention to the voters and their 61% disapproval rating of the President's job on the economy. If he can't find ways to prove to his constituents he wants to get federal spending under control, Minnesota voters will moo and quack him right out of office next November.

Paul said on Dec 09 2005 at 11:20am
Kennedy obviously seems to think that moving left is the way to the Senate. Minnesotans, especially those in his district, need to tell him otherwise.

Joe said on Dec 09 2005 at 11:28am
God save us from "our friends."