A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until a majority of voters discover that they can vote themselves largess out of the public treasury.--Lord Woodhouselee
Navigate

Blog Home

NTU Home Page

Blog FAQs

About "Government Bytes!"

Support NTU

 
Subscribe
Sign up with NTU's Taxpayer Action Center





 
Blog Contributors
Aleksander Danilov
Guest Blogger

Andrew Moylan
Director of Government Affairs

Dan Barrett
Policy Analyst

David Keating
Senior Counselor

Demian Brady
Senior Policy Analyst

Elizabeth Terrell
Guest Blogger

Jeff Dircksen
Director of Congressional Analysis

Jordan Forbes
Federal Government Affairs Manager

Joshua Culling
State Government Affairs Manager

Kristina Rasmussen
Guest Blogger

Kristine Tuinstra
State Policy Analyst

NTU Gov
Government Affairs & Communications Associate

Paul Gessing
Guest Blogger

Pete Sepp
Vice President for Communications

Rachael Slobodien
Communications Manager

Ross Kaminsky
Blogger

Sam Batkins
Guest Blogger

Tom Horne
Policy Associate

Send to a Friend
Email:
Send to Friend
The Official Blog of National Taxpayers Union

Ending Royal Mail’s 370-year Postal Monopoly

Posted by Kristina Rasmussen - January 04, 2006

One week before the U.S. Postal Service is expected to increase rates by 5.4%, Great Britain ended Royal Mail’s 370-year monopoly and fully opened its postal market to private competition on January 1. Private enterprises now have the chance to compete for business-to-business and business-to-consumer mail.

Great Britain joins countries such as Germany, New Zealand, Sweden, Japan, South Africa, the Netherlands, the Philippines, and Jordan in moving toward the advantages of postal privatization. Other EU member states are charged will fully liberalizing their postal systems by 2009.

As American customers enviously gaze over the pond to the increased postal choice and price competition enjoyed by British postal consumers, chances of reforming the bloated and outdated USPS monopoly in 2006 look increasingly slim. A thorough overhaul of the postal service is needed now to avert a future taxpayer bailout, or the cost of our mail will reach far beyond the loose change we pay today for a stamp.

Thoughts?   Add Comment -


Mark Marsay said on Jan 10 2006 at 9:06am
Any one who has had a problem with Royal Mail will tell you that the end of its 'monopoly' means squat to the normal consumer. And even if you are a business customer who choses to find another postal carrier, over 90% of the mail will still be carried to the end user by Royal Mail - how exactly is this an end to a monopoly.


said on Jan 10 2006 at 1:27pm
The "ing" in "ending" implies continuing action. Royal Mail no longer has an official monopoly over postal service in the UK, and allowing other providers to compete is the start of “ending” Royal Mail’s de-facto delivery monopoly.